🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump previously went for the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.